| #523 | A majority of apologists will acknowledge the distinction between moral wrong and pragmatic wrong, yet, will later equivocate, claiming nonbelievers acknowledge a particular behavior is [unqualified] “wrong”. The omission of the qualifier seems intentional. Is it? |
In other words, why do apologists ask questions such as “You know X is wrong” and do not simply add a disambiguating qualifier such as in “morally wrong” or “pragmatically wrong”?
STR Asked... 