Tag Archives: Logical space

Suffering or its Inverse Evidence of God?

#635 | “In the suffering is the affirmation that our worldview is true” -Jon Noyes
How much suffering? What would non-suffering affirm? Is there a falsifiable formulation of this notion? Would not suffering affirm the veracity of any God that promised believers would suffer?

Every Possible Outcome Points to God

#415 | Doesn’t the combination of the survivorship bias and the misjudgment how easy it is to find a beautiful and satisfying life after tragedy lead naturally and irrationally to claims of an Awesome God? Can any promise of God be rendered falsifiable within this disposition?

The Goal of Unfalsifiability

#387 | Apologists thoughout history seized the unexplained, and inserted their God as the explanation. In contrast, apologists now cite the burgeoning naturalistic explanations as evidence of the amazing forethought of their God. Is there anything possible within this logical space that would count against God? Why does it appear that unfalsifiability is a major goal of Christian apologetics?