#599 | Is not the question of a God, while claiming to love infants, has infants hacked into pieces a wholly logical question instead of a moral question? Why do some claim this is intrinsically a moral issue? Why need we go further than simply showing this God is logically absurd?
The following argument is strangely considered to be about the problem of evil rather than a logical problem. I suppose a solution is not found in the scripted responses of apologists, so they respond with the next closest response…which is, in essence, not close at all.
Is it logically possible for someone to both 1) never lie and 2) love innocent infants, and 3) command a vicious death for those loved infants? Please elaborate if so.
#423 | Is there a logical contradiction between the following 2 statements?
— A: There is clearly a creator of the universe. — B: The God of the Bible is clearly non-existent.
If not, can the existence of a creator be considered intrinsic evidence for the Christian God? Does clear evidence for a sphere make a cubical sphere more likely?
#418 | If I as a Christian father deeply love my infant daughter who lives with my ex-wife in a Muslim culture, consistent the reasoning behind Pascal‘s Wager, should I not kill my daughter given the probability she will become Muslim and incur the penalty of eternal torment?
#413 | If, instead of directly answering a direct question from a non-believer, I ask my own question and expose weaknesses in his position, have I honestly and with integrity defended Christianity? Or do I have to answer his question if I am to engage honestly?
#062 | Why, when I question the coherency of an allegedly loving God acting in ways we would unequivocally call unloving were a human the actor, do apologists think I’m referencing the Problem of Evil? An unloving loving God is a logical absurdity, not a moral problem, right?
STR Asked... 